This contains all I have managed to discover regarding the above. Sorry to tell you that it will contain a fair number of attachments and links!!!!!!!!! For some of the links you need to hover you mouse over it, then hold down the 'control' button and 'left click'.
Firstly in the UK:
No matter if the 'Bill' originates in the Lords or the Commons the Statement of Compatibility (SOC) must be included in the Explanatory Notes at the second reading stage of the Bill.
I have found two examples; attachment 1 (para.228) andhttp://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmbills/004/en/07004x--.htm (para.21) These are made after a recommendation made by the Joint Scrutiny Committee-Human Rights found herehttp://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200708/jtselect/jtrights/165/16510.htm#n195 (Para.224), this is, for our purposes, a mirror of your P.84 the only difference being that it was a success! The principle legislation, the equivalent to Jerseys HR Act Art. 16 may be found herehttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1998/ukpga_19980042_en_2 Art.19.
In Australia
It is more complicated here as each territory (NSW, Victoria, Northern Territories, et.al.) each have their own Human Rights Charter. I have found a couple of examples of SOC; attachments 2 and 3. These are Charter rights under Victorian law. A link to the principle legislation is herehttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/cohrara2006433/s28.html Also this newsletter http://www.hrlrc.org.au/files/BU9CRHJCO7/VGSO%20-%20Newsletter%203.pdf
I had a reply from Ms Sue Ryan this morning. (I copied my original e-mail to you a few days ago). (I will forward her reply in a moment) She confirms that Australia has no Human Rights Act. However, before the Canberra Government went into recess prior to the General Election, there was a Bill before the House to make SOC mandatory on national bills. Here are the guidance notes. http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/agd.nsf/Page/Humanrightsandanti-discrimination_FrequentlyAskedQuestions-ParliamentaryScrutiny There is a link to the proposed principle legislation in the grey panel at lower right of those notes. As Ms. Ryan says this is not yet law.
I found a web site by an Australian lawyer who takes a look at Human Rightshttp://charterblog.wordpress.com/category/s28-compatibility-statement/ in Victoria, I found it interesting and it has dozens of useful links.
In New Zealand
Before I give the one link I have found I have to tell you that the New Zealand Governments' websites are a total labyrinth and are very user unfriendly. However I found this http://www2.justice.govt.nz/lac/pubs/2001/legislative_guide_2000/chapter_4.html . New Zealand SOC legislation needs to satisfy two sets of criteria firstly the 'Bill of Rights' and secondly the 'Human Rights Act'. All very cumbersome and really not worth pursuing as a model for us!
In my opinion the Australian legislation is the most straightforward and may be useful as a model for you to quote in any future legislation you may wish to bring to The States.
Kindest regards
J Hurst